<aside>

A Reading of an Integrated Marketing Agency's Process Manual

</aside>


What Went In

An 88-page process manual from an integrated marketing agency. The document described how work moves from client intake through creative execution and delivery. It had been created during an internal initiative, presented to leadership, and filed in a shared drive.

The team referenced the document occasionally. Nobody had ever read it as structural data.

The friction the manual was meant to address never went away.


What the Document Contained

Measure Value Note
Total steps 24 Large for a single declared workflow
Total transitions 27 Non-linear: includes parallel execution paths
Unique roles 7 Spanning multiple departments
Cross-role transitions 18 of 27 67% of all transitions cross department boundaries
Approval steps 4 of 24 Contract, business case, presentation, creative execution
Convergence points 3 → 1 Three parallel paths feed into a single step
Declared exceptions 0 No exception handling paths documented

What the Engine Found

Bottleneck Risk

Three parallel execution paths converge on a single step. Nothing downstream can move until all three arrive. The team knew this step was slow. They assumed it was the person.

Detection basis: In-degree of 3 at convergence step. All three inbound transition IDs traceable to parallel paths in the execution phase.


Handoff Density

Two out of every three transitions cross a department boundary. Work changes hands constantly. The dominant pattern is a coordination structure where work is repeatedly handed off to specialist departments and returned, then handed off again.

Detection basis: 18 of 27 transitions involve a role change between source step and target step.


Exception Fragility